Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Successor is Olympus E-P3
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Revealed February 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview

Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-P2 was released 6 years prior to the SH-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-P2 matches up against the SH-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SH-3

 E-P2 SH-3 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-P2

 SH-3 E-P2 
RevealedFebruary 2016April 2010More modern by 70 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-3

 E-P2 SH-3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 comes with external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

See the Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-P2 vs the SH-3.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and SH-3 is 86 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and SH-3.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Portrait photography camera
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
44
good MP (16MP)
features face detect focus
supports RAW files
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Street photography camera
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
70
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
boasts focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Olympus SH-3
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery power (300 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
51
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
features tracking focus
better than average battery pack (380 shots)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography information
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography information
43
missing Timelapse recording
low battery power (300 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
74
better than average battery pack (380 shots)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
boasts focus via touch
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography information
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography information
60
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
low battery power (300 per charge)
missing Timelapse recording
55
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (380 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging advice
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging advice
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
35
fairly wide (25mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-3
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus Stylus SH-3
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus Stylus SH-3
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-04-22 2016-02-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 11.5 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355g (0.78 lb) 271g (0.60 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 380 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $799 $579