Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
38
Features
29
Overall
34

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Revealed April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
  • 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Superseded the Olympus SP-820UZ
  • Newer Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-P2 was brought out 3 years before the SP-820UZ which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-P2 grades versus the SP-820UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SP-820UZ

 E-P2 SP-820UZ 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-P2

 SP-820UZ E-P2 
AnnouncedAugust 2012April 2010More modern by 28 months
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ

 E-P2 SP-820UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has sizing of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-P2 compared to the SP-820UZ.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and SP-820UZ is 86 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and SP-820UZ.

All in all, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-820UZ will result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography advice
Olympus SP-820UZ Portrait photography advice
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
34
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography information
Olympus SP-820UZ Street photography information
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
37
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than others (485g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography highlights
Olympus SP-820UZ Sports photography highlights
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (300 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
33
great zoom range (22-896mm 40.7 x zoom)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
43
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
55
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (22mm)
long reach (896mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (485 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-820UZ Landscape photography factors
60
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
35
relatively wide (22mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging info
Olympus SP-820UZ Vlogging info
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic support
25
relatively wide (22mm)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
does not have external microphone socket
more heavy than others (485 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-04-22 2012-08-21
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 22-896mm (40.7x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.4-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 15.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 485 grams (1.07 lb)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $799 $299