Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-P2 was brought out 3 years before the SP-820UZ which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-P2 grades versus the SP-820UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
E-P2 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-P2
SP-820UZ | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | April 2010 | More modern by 28 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ
E-P2 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has sizing of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-820UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-P2 compared to the SP-820UZ.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and SP-820UZ is 86 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and SP-820UZ.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-820UZ will result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 15.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 485 grams (1.07 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $799 | $299 |