Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus 6000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P2 was announced 10 months later than the 6000 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-P2 scores vs the 6000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus 6000
E-P2 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-P2
6000 | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus 6000
E-P2 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 has physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus 6000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 compared to the 6000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf5dc/bf5dc44071ef44bb107430a7e62a197fe6a9ad86" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and 6000 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30302/3030216b161ab441a8800283660875a1941c8818" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The photograph below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and 6000.
All in all, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-P2 will give more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-P2 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21fe7/21fe7ca0dbacb330b11dedc3012499d13448124b" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3422a/3422a687d49a3326c67ef317483e2aadf5102866" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-04-22 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $799 | $259 |