Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus 6020, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is very similar but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-P2 was brought out 3 months later than the 6020 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-P2 grades vs the 6020 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus 6020
E-P2 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-P2
6020 | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus 6020
E-P2 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 provides outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P2 against the 6020.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2dda/e2dda752f9eb000e004f369ff916a8f6e4d36bdb" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and 6020 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c205c/c205ce0347d7d361c7ac98157fa1aac664e3eaa9" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and 6020.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus 6020 will deliver greater detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe0c1/fe0c1883c16d41128bdca777db85e5fd6680cdb2" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5a92/b5a92546a6cfc715816ee858674a7e005531f132" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $279 |