Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-P1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P2 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the TG-860 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-P2 grades vs the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-860
E-P2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-P2
TG-860 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | April 2010 | More modern by 58 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-860
E-P2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 has got physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-P2 compared to the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02d95/02d956f7452e2b5e19dc24eb3ba72c46d3956ae3" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and TG-860 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce379/ce37994e15670ee14f09ec467a0974a9ffa3bdca" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and TG-860.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-860 will render greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d9cd/6d9cd9af3d8fc3537dba4549b58c95fc47569668" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66f57/66f5758006e8af7dba832f6a1facd31c0f4d3943" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $799 | $279 |