Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-870, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P2 was released 6 years earlier than the TG-870 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-P2 scores against the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-870
E-P2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-P2
TG-870 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | April 2010 | More modern by 69 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-870
E-P2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 provides outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 versus the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/477ba/477ba97a88d40fdc7134bf135fb741e99abdb0a6" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and TG-870 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d62a5/d62a5984270d4186016c309afb8f29b9af0578fe" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and TG-870.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38e8f/38e8f8c1d1581d4e75db971994b1b2aea04714dd" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45eb6/45eb6a049408269be6dc1ecc8bcd8bc2786a0350" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-04-22 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 300 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $280 |