Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-310, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P2 was introduced 8 months earlier than the TG-310 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-P2 scores vs the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-310
E-P2 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-P2
TG-310 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | More recent by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-310
E-P2 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 has external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-P2 compared to the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92185/92185590739edd7a48117c7c5c00ae2aa57178d7" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and TG-310 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03a31/03a31197ece2f0e4518bbda3f0d1f461506de352" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and TG-310.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-310 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d64/10d649f8480cf1f72d180d106e86a78c2a48ad67" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9f54/a9f543e0500db7cc18ed5b297e53cbe0efbcf3ea" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus TG-310 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 150 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $0 |