Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-P2 was introduced 3 years before the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-P2 grades versus the TG-630 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-P2 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-P2
TG-630 iHS | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | April 2010 | Fresher by 33 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-P2 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 features external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c625f/c625fef9c499b47a502d239bf02aa2f0fa1223b1" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and TG-630 iHS is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98caf/98cafd4af28e10b1aa3594de283d6abfcd4ad107" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The visual here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and TG-630 iHS.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The E-P2 offers the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF easier. The older E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3200/a3200449c4231d2e1fa63280e2d9d70f5ac5a49c" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ed32/0ed320fb87fa4c883d39ddd0976d03809156af65" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 220 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $799 | $200 |