Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus TG-810 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-P1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-810, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-P2 was announced 16 months prior to the TG-810 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-P2 matches up against the TG-810 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-810

 E-P2 TG-810 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-P2

 TG-810 E-P2 
IntroducedAugust 2011April 2010Newer by 16 months
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-810

 E-P2 TG-810 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has got physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-810 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-P2 compared to the TG-810.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and TG-810 is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and TG-810.

Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-810 will offer more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-810 as a Portrait photography camera
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
33
resolution is good (14MP)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-P2
Street photography with Olympus TG-810
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Olympus TG-810
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (300 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
low fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (220 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-810 Travel photography information
43
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low battery pack (300 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
64
environment sealing
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (220 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-810
60
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (300 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
43
fairly wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery power (220 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-810 Vlogging factors
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
30
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-810
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus TG-810
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus TG-810
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2010-04-22 2011-08-16
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355g (0.78 lb) 215g (0.47 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos 220 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $799 $428