Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Old Model is Olympus E-P1
  • New Model is Olympus E-P3
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-P2 was launched 21 months before the TG-820 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-P2 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-P2 TG-820 iHS 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-P2

 TG-820 iHS E-P2 
IntroducedFebruary 2012April 2010More recent by 21 months
Display resolution1030k230kSharper display (+800k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-P2 TG-820 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 provides exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 vs the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and TG-820 iHS is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and TG-820 iHS.

As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The E-P2 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The older E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography features
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
27
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography features
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (300 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography advice
43
doesn't have Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (300 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
59
weather proofing
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (220 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
60
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (300 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
38
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focus
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2010-04-22 2012-02-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,030k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355g (0.78 lb) 206g (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 220 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $799 $500