Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-P2 was launched 21 months before the TG-820 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-P2 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-P2 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-P2
TG-820 iHS | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | April 2010 | More recent by 21 months |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-P2 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 provides exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 vs the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9f1a/c9f1a8cc4269de34cbea936a755ebd05953944ec" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and TG-820 iHS is 86 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5bef/c5bef01b8ecd330b24b7c0cf6e95b1c32bd9a1ab" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The E-P2 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The older E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b12a/9b12af1901b29a70341e347e653bf596583c0bf3" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e37a/4e37aaa2cec70cf6cf8e6d1abf62f804e24114bf" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $799 | $500 |