Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Renewed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is very close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-P2 was revealed 24 months prior to the TG-1 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-P2 scores versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-P2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-P2
TG-1 iHS | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | ![]() | April 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-P2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 has got physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 versus the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3476/e34763462d8e78d04133c3e5eccf459e93574f4b" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and TG-1 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86da9/86da98afc12a04864fd742a1ac6fae4d21868141" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and TG-1 iHS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-P2 offers the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The older E-P2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0e39/e0e396eb2481a4e84001ae0a6cab6cba112024b9" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a591d/a591d127628a92ff5872de64bf969e6436bdb734" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $399 |