Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-P1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus VG-145, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-P2 was introduced 15 months prior to the VG-145 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-P2 grades versus the VG-145 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus VG-145
E-P2 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-P2
VG-145 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus VG-145
E-P2 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 against the VG-145.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3259/a3259672b461cca5e0a7399161b5986f0a314fbd" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and VG-145 is 86 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bf6a/6bf6a896b68675fa4c4b6926d04eb8aaf7f19956" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and VG-145.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VG-145 will give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-P2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bd46/0bd469796b08d4239fa5179a4c53aa0e0c7e3af0" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbd4c/dbd4ce3d297229de189d176cd5dc77f788e8b8e0" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus VG-145 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 160 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $0 |