Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-P3
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus VR-340, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was revealed 20 months earlier than the VR-340 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-P2 grades against the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus VR-340

 E-P2 VR-340 
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-P2

 VR-340 E-P2 
LaunchedJanuary 2012April 2010Fresher by 20 months
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus VR-340

 E-P2 VR-340 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 features exterior measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-P2 versus the VR-340.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and VR-340 is 86 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and VR-340.

Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VR-340 will give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography features
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
34
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography features
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery power (300 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography details
43
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (300 shots)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
60
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery power (300 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
43
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging features
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
33
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus VR-340
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-04-22 2012-01-10
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lbs) 125 gr (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $799 $130