Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee971/ee97147179d1c3cc1d6b160f5f8c90a034b8f19f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R front Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R front"
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Introduced February 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and S1R (47MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and S1R (Full frame) have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P2 was released 9 years earlier than the S1R and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic S1R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-P2 scores versus the S1R in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic S1R
E-P2 | S1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Olympus E-P2
S1R | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2019 | ![]() | April 2010 | More recent by 106 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1870k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic S1R
E-P2 | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 provides outside measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic S1R has specifications of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") along with a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-P2 compared to the S1R.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ecbb/5ecbba96b682c7c05b89cd9921ace50d8fbb45c9" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and S1R is 86 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bad0b/bad0baf2248163fa0fe7c09adecb48a67b8138c2" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and S1R.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Panasonic S1R will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/749dd/749dd4b0db3d017670e4f60899554a82fcf1a50f" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ad54/5ad54841c7ad4be231cbb776e7244664bad0be07" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2019-02-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 47 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 8000 x 6000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Total lenses | 107 | 30 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.2" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 1020 gr (2.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 360 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | - |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Cost at release | $799 | $3,698 |