Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74ffb/74ffb1851885b9e3957d5f8590417174f0eb5bfe" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the FH1 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-P2 was manufactured 4 months later than the FH1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-P2 scores versus the FH1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic FH1
E-P2 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-P2
FH1 | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FH1
E-P2 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Panasonic FH1 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-P2 and the FH1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/156ed/156edcc17a30f2cd5e2f3ab5d15a1499859bf356" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and FH1 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1330c/1330c454213fec1aee785662c7291bab66c4ea2d" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The photograph below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and FH1.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-P2 has got the larger sensor which should make getting bokeh easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22d6a/22d6a410df7a7ca33bef7274e221bb4344106921" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75fa4/75fa464e6f321f499847c071bbe895cac53fb424" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 163g (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $150 |