Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FH25, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P2 was released 8 months before the FH25 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-P2 grades vs the FH25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic FH25
E-P2 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-P2
FH25 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FH25
E-P2 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic FH25 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FH25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 and the FH25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0ac3/d0ac3acd6e6299d9487bffd669f3481379b83e5d" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and FH25 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d68e4/d68e413d0e2e8f20d803b597ac31593eae36e3c7" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and FH25.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FH25 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2b98/d2b981b69b435ae48b69094b1d2f3bb4a4103183" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53cd4/53cd4564c10bc6124e7e22b427e588c4db486dd0" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 250 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $180 |