Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c53/58c53fd189a0b402571d0bfc738fe9c100c02101" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-P1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic FH27, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and FH27 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and FH27 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-P2 was manufactured 8 months earlier than the FH27 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH27 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-P2 scores against the FH27 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic FH27
E-P2 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus E-P2
FH27 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | Newer by 8 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FH27
E-P2 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 has external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic FH27 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic FH27 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 versus the FH27.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/351c3/351c3d75d01c8fd9e696803e175ebce5189785ab" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and FH27 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2d1/1d2d1ec0149453faf60a5c4bb0de4ccff4e33e24" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The image here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and FH27.
All in all, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FH27 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686b4/686b4c0c9d3fdc9abefd64a698b1b68e63ad1eb0" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92722/92722a909622b40f3eadf29373fb78d3109d12bc" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 250 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $799 | $229 |