Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10548/105481727825cb9cec94d025b6a727750d258e12" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Released July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic FP8, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-P2 was brought out 9 months later than the FP8 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-P2 matches up against the FP8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic FP8
E-P2 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 9 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-P2
FP8 | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FP8
E-P2 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Panasonic FP8 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic FP8 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 compared to the FP8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1d99/c1d99de557f2ccbc250568a889e51c22bbb446c1" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and FP8 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15bdd/15bddaed836b6fbe99e3436f55901b179d648329" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and FP8.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The E-P2 uses the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher E-P2 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ceb82/ceb820e080990c4327db0f3a6445436670474990" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bc76/4bc76acd866ff56e1d64f03d8b7a39b5d036b7d5" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-04-22 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $300 |