Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc5a2/dc5a23e639490cb05b989f13eba4ea99bfc355d5" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
- Renewed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic FX90, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the FX90 (12MP) is very well matched but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and FX90 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P2 was launched 16 months prior to the FX90 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX90 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-P2 matches up versus the FX90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic FX90
E-P2 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus E-P2
FX90 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | Fresher by 16 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FX90
E-P2 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Panasonic FX90 has sizing of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic FX90 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 and the FX90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e123b/e123b1c29a37c32649cf8a8e9a225a6356090c25" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and FX90 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e25a/4e25a13a8bcd52ea7310a23545cf0ad925f040e7" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and FX90.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The E-P2 features the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The older E-P2 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/211e1/211e1fdd5bb8e3233dd6b006305d07f45f0fee15" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23026/23026f2d5b5250a7f63cdf07ab585d9a3e96e923" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-04-22 | 2011-08-26 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 149 grams (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 200 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $799 | $227 |