Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
65 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 606g - 146 x 87 x 77mm
- Released April 2007
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic L1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and L1 (7MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-P2 was launched 3 years after the L1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic L1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-P2 grades against the L1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic L1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic L1
| E-P2 | L1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2010 |  | April 2007 | Newer by 37 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 207k | Crisper screen (+23k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic L1 over the Olympus E-P2
| L1 | E-P2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic L1
| E-P2 | L1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 offers outer dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic L1 has dimensions of 146mm x 87mm x 77mm (5.7" x 3.4" x 3.0") along with a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic L1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 against the L1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and L1 is 86 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and L1.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus E-P2 to show more detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger E-P2 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic L1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2007-04-11 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 7 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3136 x 2352 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 207 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 606 grams (1.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 146 x 87 x 77mm (5.7" x 3.4" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $799 | $1,500 |
