Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cde8a/cde8ae3d9a970d7e06af008ddd56b6e5ce2c506d" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-P1
- Renewed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 65 x 43mm
- Launched December 2011
- Earlier Model is Panasonic LX3
- Successor is Panasonic LX7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic LX5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the LX5 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and LX5 (1/1.63") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P2 was released 20 months earlier than the LX5 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic LX5 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-P2 matches up versus the LX5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic LX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic LX5
E-P2 | LX5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX5 over the Olympus E-P2
LX5 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | More recent by 20 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic LX5
E-P2 | LX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 has physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LX5 has measurements of 110mm x 65mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P2 versus Panasonic LX5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-P2 and the LX5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/968c4/968c43b58332c9651070c2fef7973f3dfae16ec6" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and LX5 is 86 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30d67/30d67d8dafb3f044829bdc40f59c808b5dcb8e16" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and LX5.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-P2 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0354f/0354f5650115f89691c71a51ab88b78c0cf6a6ba" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67d9a/67d9ae63475f3eda890d1fbcf5272cc6a33d5485" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic LX5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2011-12-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-90mm (3.8x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-3.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 65 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | 41 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 19.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | 132 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $294 |