Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a83/a3a8345ec89b1fa7b1b27cd7338ab82f26546b0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-P1
- Updated by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-ZX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic ZR1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-P2 was revealed 9 months later than the ZR1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-P2 grades against the ZR1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic ZR1
E-P2 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-P2
ZR1 | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic ZR1
E-P2 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 features exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic ZR1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P2 against the ZR1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49dbf/49dbf17715ebe02c1f45d4bef7a8cb9a807db9c3" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and ZR1 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b77b/9b77ba25c5c51466e1153eb05813307a3ff29602" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and ZR1.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The E-P2 comes with the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The fresher E-P2 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9537/b95373b258f6fcf473b6e3920b6c9ae244fac6b1" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/370ed/370ed95dedb091f29a1466c47c4af62d45464466" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $799 | $280 |