Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d60/91d606f8f15554d192c44ec0e68c877e6a1eff9a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic ZS3, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P2 was revealed 12 months later than the ZS3 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-P2 scores versus the ZS3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic ZS3
E-P2 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-P2
ZS3 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic ZS3
E-P2 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys outer dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS3 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic ZS3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-P2 and the ZS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac03b/ac03b7e17c19f35f8b7d7d74a0a113a75f154aea" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and ZS3 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a778/6a778c88912a50683e361c3aa850058e43f1355e" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and ZS3.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-P2 will resolve more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger E-P2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/090bf/090bf9feab3c06aafa9a69788d73182f10fcc6b7" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d9c4/7d9c411054d524f8a575e31d60ae478ba6466329" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-04-22 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 229 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $200 |