Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-P1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Announced September 2008
- Succeeded the Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is very close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-P2 was launched 20 months after the K200D making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-P2 scores against the K200D with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Pentax K200D. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Pentax K200D
E-P2 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2010 | ![]() | September 2008 | More modern by 20 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-P2
K200D | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax K200D
E-P2 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 features external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 vs the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5ffe/f5ffee16a2dd87632fd025c0a106b320e6f0bf27" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and K200D is 86 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a358a/a358a6eeea74a62fc8a157ff5f61ea7a9c39726e" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and K200D.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-P2 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-P2 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa54a/aa54aa02be54b6c0989c22c5167ea1d6fb253071" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41144/411446295ac3d07b2f4796eb968ee49402419893" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Pentax K200D |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2008-09-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 690 grams (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 505 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $600 |