Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40ec3/40ec3edada586daa79cb0534b5c4f85df6917a23" alt="Pentax Optio RZ10 front Pentax Optio RZ10 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 versus Pentax RZ10, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and RZ10 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P2 was announced 15 months before the RZ10 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-P2 grades vs the RZ10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Pentax Optio RZ10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Pentax RZ10
E-P2 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus E-P2
RZ10 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | More modern by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax RZ10
E-P2 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 comes with outside measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ10 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P2 versus Pentax RZ10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 vs the RZ10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b4d1/8b4d1f038f9937bcbf5434aa00c8fef38d181081" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and RZ10 is 86 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb932/fb93273c09c86a4ad9a2a26dd63434b65383d3a0" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and RZ10.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 with its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Pentax RZ10 will produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15b52/15b52c2507b932711d00ce98de7a574c46e0bf14" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37a5f/37a5f5846ed1408d8f2713db8fc933f715c99f0f" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 178g (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 178 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $200 |