Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Pentax Optio WG-1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-P1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Pentax WG-1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
  • Revealed February 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-P2 was introduced 9 months before the WG-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-P2 grades versus the WG-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Pentax WG-1

 E-P2 WG-1 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-P2

 WG-1 E-P2 
RevealedFebruary 2011April 2010Fresher by 9 months

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1

 E-P2 WG-1 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 offers exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 vs the WG-1.

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and WG-1 is 86 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and WG-1.

Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography factors
Pentax WG-1 Portrait photography factors
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
low MP (12MP)
35
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography advice
Pentax WG-1 Street photography advice
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
54
environment sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Sports photography camera
Pentax WG-1 as a Sports photography camera
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
max fps low (3.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 shots)
has no phase detect AF
37
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax WG-1 as a Travel photography camera
43
no Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (300 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography factors
Pentax WG-1 Landscape photography factors
60
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
42
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment sealing
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging info
Pentax WG-1 Vlogging info
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic jack
25
really wide (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1
 Olympus PEN E-P2Pentax Optio WG-1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Pentax Optio WG-1
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2010-04-22 2011-02-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 157 grams (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 260 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $799 $350