Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-P2 was introduced 9 months before the WG-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-P2 grades versus the WG-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Pentax WG-1
E-P2 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-P2
WG-1 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | April 2010 | Fresher by 9 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1
E-P2 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 offers exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P2 and Pentax WG-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 vs the WG-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and WG-1 is 86 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and WG-1.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P2 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-04-22 | 2011-02-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 157 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $350 |