Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Old Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was unveiled 15 months after the CX1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-P2 grades vs the CX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Ricoh CX1

 E-P2 CX1 
ReleasedApril 2010February 2009Newer by 15 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-P2

 CX1 E-P2 
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Ricoh CX1

 E-P2 CX1 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 compared to the CX1.

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and CX1 is 86 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and CX1.

Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-P2 will give you extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent E-P2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography features
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography features
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
25
manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography info
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery (300 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Ricoh CX1
43
lack of Timelapse mode
bad battery (300 per charge)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
low MP (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX1
60
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery (300 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
42
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not possible
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging features
Ricoh CX1 Vlogging features
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
28
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus PEN E-P2Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Ricoh CX1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-04-22 2009-02-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-200mm (7.1x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 180 gr (0.40 pounds)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $799 $299