Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
90 Imaging
56 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
Photography Glossary Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-P2 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe E-P2 was introduced 4 years before the GR and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-P2 grades versus the GR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Ricoh GR
| E-P2 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-P2
| GR | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 | April 2010 | More recent by 36 months | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Ricoh GR
| E-P2 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 provides outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P2 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 compared to the GR.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and GR is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and GR.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Ricoh GR will provide more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-04-22 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 300s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 505 | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $799 | $971 |