Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
42
Overall
44
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Revealed April 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was released 9 months after the GR Digital III which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-P2 scores vs the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-P2 GR Digital III 
AnnouncedApril 2010July 2009More modern by 9 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-P2

 GR Digital III E-P2 
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-P2 GR Digital III 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 vs the GR Digital III.

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and GR Digital III is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and GR Digital III.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-P2 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern E-P2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography factors
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
39
focusing manually
supports RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
55
supports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
39
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
low battery (300 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
16
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography info
43
no Time Lapse function
low battery (300 shots)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
63
has built in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
60
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
low battery (300 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
44
focusing manually
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3")
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focus
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic socket
25
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-P2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus PEN E-P2Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Ricoh GR Digital III
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-04-22 2009-07-27
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 208 gr (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $799 $399