Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-P2 and Samsung GX-1L, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and GX-1L (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-P2 was released 4 years after the GX-1L which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-P2 scores vs the GX-1L in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Samsung GX-1L
| E-P2 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2010 | February 2006 | Newer by 51 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Crisper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Olympus E-P2
| GX-1L | E-P2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Samsung GX-1L
| E-P2 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 offers physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P2 and Samsung GX-1L in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 vs the GX-1L.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and GX-1L is 86 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and GX-1L.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-P2 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-P2 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-04-22 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 570 grams (1.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $799 | $0 |