Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched January 2006
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-P2 versus Samsung GX-1S, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and GX-1S (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-P2 was introduced 4 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-P2 scores vs the GX-1S in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Samsung GX-1S
| E-P2 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2010 | January 2006 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus E-P2
| GX-1S | E-P2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Samsung GX-1S
| E-P2 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P2 versus Samsung GX-1S in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P2 vs the GX-1S.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and GX-1S is 86 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-P2 will produce more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger E-P2 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 605 grams (1.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $799 | $850 |