Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
42
Overall
44
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-P2 was introduced 3 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-P2 grades against the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Samsung WB800F

 E-P2 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus E-P2

 WB800F E-P2 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013April 2010More recent by 33 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Samsung WB800F

 E-P2 WB800F 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 features exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-P2 vs the WB800F.

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and WB800F is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and WB800F.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography highlights
59
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
43
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography info
Samsung WB800F Street photography info
73
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (218g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography information
Samsung WB800F Sports photography information
39
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low MP (12MP)
terrible battery (300 per charge)
no phase detect AF
52
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
43
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery (300 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than average in class (218g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
60
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (300 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
49
has manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
Vlogging with Samsung WB800F
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
35
reasonably wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (218 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus PEN E-P2Samsung WB800F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Samsung WB800F
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-04-22 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 grams (0.78 pounds) 218 grams (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $799 $300