Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2010
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released January 2008
  • Updated by Sony A330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was released 2 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-P2 grades against the A300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony A300

 E-P2 A300 
ReleasedApril 2010January 2008Fresher by 28 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-P2

 A300 E-P2 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony A300

 E-P2 A300 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 features outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 and the A300.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and A300 is 86 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and A300.

All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P2 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus E-P2 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer E-P2 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-P2
Portrait photography with Sony A300
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-P2
Street photography with Sony A300
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
74
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Sony A300
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
low battery life (300 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography info
Sony A300 Travel photography info
43
does not have Timelapse function
low battery life (300 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography details
Sony A300 Landscape photography details
60
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
low battery life (300 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse function
57
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging highlights
Sony A300 Vlogging highlights
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
9
can't shoot video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony A300
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2010-04-22 2008-01-30
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 632 grams (1.39 lbs)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 64
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 11.4
DXO Low light score 505 538
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $799 $0