Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Updated by Olympus E-P3
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Released September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-P2 and Sony QX1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-P2 was launched 5 years earlier than the QX1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-P2 matches up against the QX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony QX1

 E-P2 QX1 
Display dimension3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution230k0kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-P2

 QX1 E-P2 
ReleasedSeptember 2014April 2010More recent by 53 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony QX1

 E-P2 QX1 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 offers outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-P2 and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 vs the QX1.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and QX1 is 86 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and QX1.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony QX1 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older E-P2 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography factors
Sony QX1 Portrait photography factors
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW files
low resolution (12MP)
66
has manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW files
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography info
Sony QX1 Street photography info
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
69
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
includes touch focus
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition (216 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Sony QX1
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution (12MP)
low battery pack (300 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
56
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
better than average battery (440 CIPA)
max fps low (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography details
Sony QX1 Travel photography details
43
no Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (300 shots)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
71
better than average battery (440 shots)
includes touch focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (216 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Landscape photography camera
60
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low resolution (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (300 CIPA)
no Time Lapse mode
64
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (440 per charge)
tiny screen ( inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging highlights
Sony QX1 Vlogging highlights
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
does not feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic jack
32
touchscreen capability
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition (216 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony QX1
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony Alpha QX1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Lens-style
Launched 2010-04-22 2014-09-03
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 6400 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch -
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355g (0.78 lbs) 216g (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images 440 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $799 $500