Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Announced April 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-P1
  • New Model is Olympus E-P3
Sony H300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
  • 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Launched February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and H300 (20MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and H300 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-P2 was released 4 years before the H300 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-P2 grades vs the H300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony H300

 E-P2 H300 
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus E-P2

 H300 E-P2 
LaunchedFebruary 2014April 2010Newer by 46 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony H300

 E-P2 H300 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got exterior measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony H300 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-P2 versus the H300.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and H300 is 86 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and H300.

Clearly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Sony H300 will show more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography info
Sony H300 Portrait photography info
60
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
40
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography factors
Sony H300 Street photography factors
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
43
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors (590 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography highlights
Sony H300 Sports photography highlights
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery pack (300 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
50
incredible zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (350 shots)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography details
Sony H300 Travel photography details
43
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (875mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (590 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H300 as a Landscape photography camera
60
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
47
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
better than average battery life (350 shots)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Vlogging camera
Sony H300 as a Vlogging camera
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
24
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic port
heavier than competitors (590g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony H300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony H300
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-04-22 2014-02-13
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V Bionz(R)
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 5152 x 3864
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-875mm (35.0x)
Max aperture - f/3-5.9
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dot
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 8.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355g (0.78 pounds) 590g (1.30 pounds)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos 350 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $799 $249