Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-P1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2013
  • Previous Model is Sony HX200V
  • Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-P2 was unveiled 3 years before the HX300 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-P2 matches up versus the HX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony HX300

 E-P2 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-P2

 HX300 E-P2 
LaunchedFebruary 2013April 2010Newer by 34 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX300

 E-P2 HX300 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 features physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 against the HX300.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and HX300 is 86 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and HX300.

As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony HX300 will produce greater detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography factors
Sony HX300 Portrait photography factors
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
43
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography info
Sony HX300 Street photography info
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
50
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than average in class (623g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography highlights
Sony HX300 Sports photography highlights
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
low battery (300 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Sony HX300
43
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery (300 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
54
good MP (20MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (623g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Sony HX300
60
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
low battery (300 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
49
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging details
Sony HX300 Vlogging details
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection autofocus
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
25
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of microphone support
more heavy than average in class (623 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX300
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-04-22 2013-02-20
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 623 gr (1.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $799 $339