Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a60/49a601b81dc9ac950ac3b4b1df8dd7ab514aa7ad" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front"
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Later Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Refreshed by Sony HX400V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P2 was unveiled 3 years before the HX300 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-P2 matches up versus the HX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony HX300
E-P2 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-P2
HX300 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | ![]() | April 2010 | Newer by 34 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX300
E-P2 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 features physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 against the HX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ae1a/1ae1af480f320baec58369740fe3c52f6668bbfb" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and HX300 is 86 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fd93/0fd9394ac16bf9044e8f97dd3cdc569c7f0c9011" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and HX300.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony HX300 will produce greater detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fae6/4fae630a8e1a84357dbb206bb5ab4a2dcb486f92" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9261/f92619eb5b9fedfaa0fb41c9b70fbc799fead5de" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-04-22 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 623 gr (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $799 | $339 |