Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Updated by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-P2 versus Sony QX10, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and QX10 (18MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and QX10 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-P2 was revealed 4 years earlier than the QX10 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-P2 matches up vs the QX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony QX10
| E-P2 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus E-P2
| QX10 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2013 | April 2010 | More recent by 41 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony QX10
| E-P2 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 features physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Sony QX10 has specifications of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P2 versus Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 against the QX10.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and QX10 is 86 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and QX10.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony QX10 will show greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-P2 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 220 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $799 | $250 |