Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Announced November 2011
  • Successor is Sony A68
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was unveiled 19 months earlier than the A65 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the E-P2 grades against the A65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony A65

 E-P2 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-P2

 A65 E-P2 
AnnouncedNovember 2011April 2010More recent by 19 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution921k230kCrisper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony A65

 E-P2 A65 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 provides outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has specifications of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 versus the A65.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and A65 is 86 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and A65.

All in all, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A65 will give you greater detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A65 as a Portrait photography camera
60
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
77
you can focus manually
MP count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography info
Sony A65 Street photography info
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
77
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography features
Sony A65 Sports photography features
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
81
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
has phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Sony A65
43
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
68
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A65 Landscape photography highlights
60
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
no Time Lapse function
75
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
Vlogging with Sony A65
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focusing
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic port
78
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony A65
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony SLT-A65
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2010-04-22 2011-11-15
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 622 gr (1.37 pounds)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 74
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.6
DXO Low light rating 505 717
Other
Battery life 300 photos 560 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $799 $700