Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Announced August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-P3 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-P3 was revealed 5 months before the TG-820 iHS and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-P3 grades versus the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P3 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-P3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
TG-820 iHS | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 614k | Sharper screen (+416k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-P3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | February 2012 | Same generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P3 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-P3 against the TG-820 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and TG-820 iHS is 86 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-P3 uses the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh simpler.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-08-17 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 220 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $500 |