Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-P3 (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-P3 was released 17 months before the TG-830 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-P3 grades versus the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-P3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
TG-830 iHS | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2011 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-P3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P3 enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-P3 versus the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and TG-830 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P3 and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P3 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-P3 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-08-17 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $0 |