Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-P3 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P3 was unveiled within a month of the VR-320 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-P3 matches up versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus VR-320
E-P3 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-P3
VR-320 | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus VR-320
E-P3 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2011 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-P3 enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P3 versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-P3 versus the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b46/d8b46afcc456c0c46e8816c3cca1b0ff09834963" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and VR-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe8c2/fe8c28f3bba2f7ca073f951c3213c6e0fc9642a1" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-P3 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e412/1e412024e0e67c5d92cf9fdae13c4e15ae655195" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ced26/ced267c34c89c06a205e9bd6881b03aff531af3e" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369g (0.81 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $179 |