Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-P2
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-P3 was launched 16 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-P3 scores against the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-P3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
XZ-2 iHS | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 16 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-P3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-P3 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P3 and the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b282/3b2827794b1a8fc97a32088cf98e6138c1e79bf2" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and XZ-2 iHS is 86 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7c19/e7c1932d44d66608c3cf366c9ba4fa0b4aaa9e97" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with the identical resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The E-P3 provides the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-P3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe210/fe210994b593e6499925b9219ddf19d6fed8fb1d" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4582d/4582d759dd22883662b66351e35363e1207568c6" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-08-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 340 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $450 |