Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic ZS200, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-P3 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") use different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-P3 was manufactured 7 years prior to the ZS200 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-P3 scores against the ZS200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P3 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-P3 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-P3
ZS200 | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | August 2011 | Newer by 79 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 614k | Clearer display (+626k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic ZS200
E-P3 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P3 enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-P3 against the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and ZS200 is 86 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P3 and ZS200.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-P3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-08-17 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 pounds) | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 370 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $800 |