Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-P3 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-P3 was introduced 6 years before the FZ2500 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-P3 scores versus the FZ2500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-P3 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-P3
FZ2500 | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 62 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+426k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-P3 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P3 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") having a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-P3 compared to the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f79f3/f79f30d2b04c363d83f8166860857eba889d7534" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and FZ2500 is 86 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c25c/0c25cef87d7d694d3b7af72a74fbafada04e7c63" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and FZ2500.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-P3 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FZ2500 will render extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-P3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a5cb/5a5cb29fd1f12477fd7db0a294d366ebd9706470" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2960/f2960a6023b625c2cd717df2df2d21c558b0a20e" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 grams (0.81 lbs) | 915 grams (2.02 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 536 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 350 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $998 |