Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
55 Imaging
78 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Pentax K-1
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-P3 (12MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and K-1 II (Full frame) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-P3 was introduced 7 years prior to the K-1 II and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-P3 scores against the K-1 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P3 and Pentax K-1 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery and Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Pentax K-1 II
E-P3 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus E-P3
K-1 II | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | August 2011 | Fresher by 79 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 614k | Crisper display (+423k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Pentax K-1 II
E-P3 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P3 offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 II has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-P3 vs the K-1 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and K-1 II is 86 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and K-1 II.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P3 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Pentax K-1 II will offer you more detail using its extra 24MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-P3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2011-08-17 | 2018-02-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 36MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 7360 x 4912 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 819200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 33 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF4 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 614k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369g (0.81 pounds) | 1010g (2.23 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 670 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Cost at release | $0 | $1,737 |