Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-P3 (12MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-P3 was announced 5 months earlier than the WG-2 GPS so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-P3 grades versus the WG-2 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P3 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-P3 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-P3
WG-2 GPS | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-P3 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2012 | Similar generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 has got external measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P3 against the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a6e9/2a6e9615bbd7132b079cdeac78f6976d5611c5a0" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and WG-2 GPS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e656e/e656e7eb4861b802260dadea22f0a3f68158c295" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P3 and WG-2 GPS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-P3 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84db8/84db83a427aaa5dfd66786d48a2607d468ee3fb6" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/032a5/032a5341af38cf2cddbcb8042418618f884b84fe" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-08-17 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 grams (0.81 pounds) | 198 grams (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 260 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $300 |