Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-P2
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-P3 was brought out 13 months after the A390 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-P3 grades against the A390 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Sony A390
E-P3 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-P3
A390 | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Sony A390
E-P3 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 features exterior dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-P3 versus the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5658/f56580cf44556d931061506a2ea9d32a9f18de81" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and A390 is 86 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40f15/40f1595737c0d55c6351c645a8a9fb2c246eabcc" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and A390.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P3 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony A390 will offer extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern E-P3 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0820/f0820de35f2f472a3d444c07eb6c9210aaa032bd" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/252d0/252d01b990f6177bb1b07f792f867c26df65f852" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-08-17 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 lb) | 549 gr (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 230 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $0 | $500 |