Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Announced October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-P5 was announced 3 years after the Tough-3000 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-P5 scores versus the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-P5 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 46 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-P5
Tough-3000 | E-P5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-P5 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P5 enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-P5 against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a469c/a469c704c81e5d6aa04a57604628ec1c1ef188cd" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P5 and Tough-3000 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3dfd/d3dfd47d96dcb9d7df8ff95b7a5314c29256ce4d" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P5 and Tough-3000.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P5 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-P5 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent E-P5 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b60d7/b60d7807516aef4755f811564dcdfb5d6c1c3127" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b9b6/9b9b688ab690721b5ea35389cf58a3f2fdd07f9d" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-10-03 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420 gr (0.93 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $389 | $0 |