Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
85 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-P5 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-P5 was manufactured 21 months after the TG-820 iHS making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-P5 grades against the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-P5 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | February 2012 | Newer by 21 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 1030k | Sharper display (+7k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-P5
TG-820 iHS | E-P5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-P5 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P5 enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P5 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-P5 against the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and TG-820 iHS is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P5 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-P5 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-P5 will give greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-P5 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420g (0.93 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 220 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $389 | $500 |