Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-P5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-P5 was revealed 10 months after the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-P5 scores against the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-P5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 10 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-P5
XZ-2 iHS | E-P5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-P5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P5 has physical dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-P5 and the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af6da/af6da35f69ae30d0ae0f5b35847b58c80db42730" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P5 and XZ-2 iHS is 85 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4221e/4221e603d27975630c0e28c2f0314f2ae1099d54" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P5 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P5 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-P5 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern E-P5 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d4c1/9d4c1577038925bd1049f4726a8ad03c70dc8e2a" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0c03/a0c033d96a47978b8d70b761f83e796b90a58988" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-10-03 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420 grams (0.93 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 340 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $389 | $450 |